The Trump Administration has launched a massive assault on our climate, our public health and our environment.
We think that’s a really bad idea.
We create tools and talking points for people who want to speak out in defense of our protections.
Make Your Voice Heard
President Trump may be having trouble getting Congress to adopt his agenda, but he has more control over federal agencies. The Trump Administration is taking dead aim at regulations that protect people’s lives, livelihoods and communities – including regulations that protect our public health and environment. Fortunately, no president can roll back regulations by fiat. The Trump Administration must go through the same process that’s used for making regulations, and that process gives everyone the opportunity to participate.
We’ve developed a how-to manual with insights and advice on HOW to to participate in a rulemaking process. It is a step-by-step guide for individuals, groups, and organizations who want to make their voices heard. Learn more about “A Practical Guide for Resisting the Trump Deregulatory Agenda” here, and download your own PDF copy of the guide.
Lower on this page, we post a list of EPA rules now open for comment, with links to information about the rules and suggested talking points for commenters.</span>
Sign Up for Email Alerts on EPA Rules Open for Comment
Rules Now Open For Comment
The Trump Administration has targeted many EPA regulations to be weakened or outright eliminated. Also targeted are related rules of other agencies. Save EPA is tracking these actions, and providing talking points to help commenters who want to resist the Trump agenda. As the people these regulations are designed to protect, we need to be loud and clear that these protections are important to us. We can’t afford to be silent while President Trump tries to take the U.S.A. backwards to a time of dirty air, polluted waters and contaminated land.
Rollback of Clean Water Act Protections
The Trump Administration wants to remove Clean Water Act protections from two million miles of waterways and millions of acres of wetlands. Rollback of this rule would put drinking water at risk for 117 million Americans.
The Clean Water Rule (“Waters of the U.S.” or WOTUS rule) was issued in 2015 to more clearly define which “waters” are protected under the Clean Water Act. The Rule’s definition of protected waters is based on hydrologic science. It recognizes the real-world connections that exist between large volume, “navigable” waters and smaller non-navigable streams and wetlands. The Clean Water Rule protects tributary streams that can greatly impact downstream water.
Part 1: Rollback of the Clean Water Rule
Comment Period Ended September 27, 2017
The proposal recently open for comment would eliminate the scientific definition of “waters of the U.S.” created in the 2015 Clean Water Rule and revert to an old, unclear definition.
Part 2: Changing the Definition of “Waters of the U.S.”
Stakeholder Teleconferences and Meeting September 19 – November 21; Opportunity to Submit Pre-Proposal Written Comments
A second rule-making will be required to propose the Trump Administration’s preferred definition of “waters of the U.S.”
The Trump Administration has posted a notice to begin the public process to re-define “Waters of the U.S.” As expected, the Administration has signaled its intent to redefine “waters of the US” to include only navigable waters.
The process outlined by the Trump Administration for Part 2 is underway. The agencies have not proposed a rule and it’s not clear when they will do so. However, EPA and the Army Corps of Engineers have scheduled ten “outreach” teleconferences and one in-person meeting to gather public comments between September 19 and November 21. Anyone can register to participate in the general public teleconference on November 21; you may have additional opportunities to participate if you are a member of a targeted category of stakeholders. Register soon — spots are limited. Also, EPA has set up a docket to accept written pre-proposal comments to be included in the administration record of the regulation to revise the definition of “Waters of the U.S.” under the Clean Water Act.
For information on the Clean Water Rule, the rollback proposal, definitions of “waters of the U.S.” — and information on how to participate or comment, including talking points — see Defending Our Waters.
Oil and Gas NSPS: Notices of Data Availability on the Proposed Three-Month Stay and Two-Year Stay
Comments Due: December 8, 2017
Find the NODAs and the new cost estimate here:
In June 2017, the Trump Administration proposed to delay certain air pollution control requirements for the oil and natural gas industry while the EPA reconsiders issues associated with these requirements. The standards at risk, called New Source Performance Standards or (NSPS), would control methane emissions and some related toxic air pollutants at new, reconstructed and modified oil and gas sources. EPA finalized these requirements in May 2016.
The Trump Administration proposed two alternative delays — a two-year stay, and a three-month stay, of the NSPS’s requirements. These proposed delays (or stays) would apply to the fugitive emissions requirements, well site pneumatic pump standards, and requirements that closed vent systems be certified by a professional engineer. The public comment period on the proposed stays closed on August 9, 2017; many of you may have commented on that proposal. (For more information, see Defending Air Pollution Standards for the Oil & Gas Sector(Methane and VOCs).
In November 2017, EPA issued two notices of data availability, “NODAs,” inviting additional public comment on the two proposed stays. The NODAs identify concerns and suggestions from certain industry stakeholders. Public comment is invited in three categories:
- EPA’s legal authority to issue the stays
- Stakeholder concerns about the challenges of meeting the requirements of the 2016 NSPS within the timeframe of the stays
- An updated economic analysis that provides the costs and benefits of the two-year stay
For more information on the NODAs and how to comment, see: Notices of Data Availability: Defending Air Pollution Standards for the Oil & Gas Sector
Proposed Reopening of Loophole for
Deadline for Public Comment: January 5, 2018
Public hearing: December 4, 2017
The Trump Administration proposed to reopen a loophole in truck pollution standards that has allowed companies to install old engines in new truck chassis without meeting modern pollution standards. Old truck engines emit high large amounts of air pollutants linked to premature death, cancer, heart attacks, exacerbation of respiratory diseases such as asthma and other health problems.
For information on the EPA’s clean truck standards, the Trump Administration rollback proposal, and how to submit comments and participate in the public hearing – including suggested talking points — see Defending Truck Standards.
Repeal of the Clean Power Plan
Comment by January 16, 2018
A public hearing will be held in Charleston, WV on November 28 and 29, 2017.
Despite the serious impacts of climate change now and in the future, the Trump administration is proposing to repeal the federal rule issued to control our country’s biggest source of climate pollution — fossil-fuel-fired power plants. The Administration has proposed to repeal the rule now and consider whether to replace it later.
The proposed repeal of the Clean Power Plan (CPP) is the next step in implementation of President Trump’s March 28 Executive Order titled “Promoting Energy Independence and Economic Growth.” The order calls for review and revision or repeal of many climate rules and policies.
The CPP was developed after years of extensive public engagement that explored how best to establish requirements under the Clean Air Act to limit climate-changing carbon dioxide (CO2) pollution from the power sector. The rule establishes emission targets and provides each state with flexibility to design its own plan for cutting CO2 pollution from fossil-fuel-fired power plants. By 2030, the CPP would help achieve a 32 percent reduction in CO2 emissions from the power sector relative to the 2005 level. CO2 reduction strategies also would cut emissions of other air pollutants that are associated with increases in heart attacks, hospital admissions for asthma attacks, and deaths.
EPA’s 2015 analysis shows that the health, environmental and other economic benefits of the CPP are large, dwarfing the costs to comply. The net benefits (the benefits minus costs) were estimated to range from between $26 billion to $45 billion in 2030. The Trump administration has produced a new economic analysis that omits some benefits and changes key assumptions, producing a different assessment to support the repeal.
EPA will accept public comments on the proposal to repeal the CPP until December 15, 2017. The agency anticipates scheduling a public hearing. For more information on this rollback proposal, the pubic hearing, and how to comment, see Defending the Clean Power Plan.