Colorado Senator Gardner has called the EPA the
“Everyone Pays A Lot” Administration.1

So how much do we really pay for EPA?

EPA's budget slice

EPA’s current budget is $8.14 billion, 0.2 percent of the projected $4-trillion fiscal year 2017 federal budget.2 With the U.S. population at about 324 million, Trump's proposed cuts would bring the EPA's yearly costs down from $25 per American to $18.81 per American.3

Over 40% of EPA’s total budget is passed through to state, local and tribal governments as grants and low cost loans. The portion of EPA’s 2015 budget that actually went to EPA is $4.7 billion—a mere 0.12% of the total federal budget. Shielding state grants from budget cuts would mean that a “25% EPA budget cut” is actually a 43% cut to the core EPA budget remaining to carry out and enforce the nation’s health and environmental laws. This means the Trump administration budget cuts would reduce EPA’s core budget to $2.665 billion. That figure represents 0.067% of the total U.S. federal budget.4

In January 2014, the New York Times broke down the federal budget per person basis. Budget numbers have changed slightly since then, but the relative costs are still in the ballpark.

Here’s how much we pay annually per person for EPA -
with some other agencies thrown in for comparison.

National Weather Service $3

National Park Service $8

National Science Foundation $23

EPA $26

NASA $56

National Institutes of Health $94

Military $1802

Veterans Compensation $267

Veteran’s Health Care $174

Medicare $1591

Social Security $2672


Of course, not everyone pays $26 - that’s just a per capita average. Here’s a breakdown by taxable income category (the average cost to taxpayers in each IRS income tax bracket, based on the EPA % share of revenue for each income bracket) . These figures are based on EPA’s 2013 budget ($7.9 billion) - which is quite a bit bigger than EPA's budget today.6

If your earnings are in the bottom half US taxpayers - less than $37,000/year - EPA cost is $13.

Between $37k and $75kEPA cost is $47.

Between $75k and $127k - EPA cost is $85.

Between $127k and $180k, EPA cost you $131.

If your earnings are in the top 5% of US taxpayers - between $180k and $428k, EPA cost you $220.

For comparison, taxpayer contributions to US military spending are about 90x the cost for environmental protection. Those taxpayers in the lowest 50% of earnings pay pay about $1170/ yr.7 Total defense spending by the U.S. government is projected to be $853.6 billion in fiscal year 2017 - 182 times higher than the budget for EPA.8

What Are We Paying For?

EPA’s Strategic Plan for 2014-2018 breaks the EPA budget down into five strategic goals.9

Goal 1: Addressing Climate Change and Improving Air QualityGoal 2: Protecting America’s Waters 

Goal 3: Cleaning Up Communities and Advancing Sustainable Development

Goal 4: Ensuring the Safety of Chemicals and Preventing Pollution

Goal 5: Protecting Human Health and the Environment by Enforcing Laws and Assuring Compliance

EPA budget NG

EPA spends two thirds of its budget on keeping air and water clean. For instance, the agency provided "tools and training to operators of small water utilities to improve resilience in drinking water wastewater and stormwater systems," according to the agency's 2016 budget. In fact, the demand for this training "far exceeded expectations so that the original two-year target of training 1,000 operators was increased to 5,000.”10

About half of this funding goes state and local government in the form of grants and contracts.11 For example, last year the agency gave $674,201 to the city of Charlestown, West Virginia, to fund fund protection measures for local groundwater and coastal salt ponds.12

About 22% of the EPA's budget goes to paying its own employees.13

For more information about the work that EPA's budget supports -
and how the Trump Administration is shifting those priorities - see our analysis at
How EPA's Priorities Are Changing in the Trump Administration


1 Gardner was a in the House at the time, representing Colorado’s 4th District. Polling in his congressional district showed that two-thirds of his constituents felt that “Congress should let the EPA do its job.”


3 xid=frommoney_soc_socialflow_twitter_money

4 Based on 2015 budget figures.


8 This figure uses only that portion of the EPA budget that goes to EPA as the point of comparison. utm_source=tw&utm_medium=tweet&utm_campaign=socialmedia

9; Figure from


11 For a detailed look at “What Proposed EPA Budget Cuts Mean to States,” go to

12 xid=frommoney_soc_socialflow_twitter_money


Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Save EPA has been an all-volunteer group of former EPA officials who became alarmed about the Trump agenda for EPA and joined together to fight it.

With newly-elected President-Elect Biden and VP-Elect Harris coming in January, the need to "save EPA" is much less urgent. This is not to imply all clear skies ahead - there is much re-building to do, there will be negative pressures on the new administration, and we will likely have policy differences in the future. However, we are hopeful that these differences will be discussed rationally, using science as a basis for moving forward, and keeping EPA's mission of protecting human health and the environment in the forefront.

And so, we are going back to retirement!  We're keeping our website up at , as a resource for those who want to follow and influence the restoration work. Our report on the Trump record at EPA describes the actions that need to be reversed [], and our guide to participating in the rulemaking process [] can help you be part of the solution.

Thank you for your support and commitment during the past 3.5 years.  While the Trump assaults were unending, they were also frequently unsuccessful, and that was due in large part to public outrage.  Keep it up!  Although EPA will be in much better hands with a Biden administration, there is always a need for an informed and engaged public.